Continuing from my previous post, about 3DS performance testing, I had to do even more performance improvement!
I was mostly flat this month, from a bit of stress :(
On the plus side, I do a short run on the treadmill when I’m at home and anxious.
I’ve also cut back on lunch meal sizes.
I’ve been eating noodles and tuna for most of my lunches instead of take away or left overs. Easy, portion controlled, cheap and somewhat healthy I guess.
I lost 5 Kilos :)
I was 77KG and now about 72KG.
Anyway, more about gamedev!
It’s mostly a commentary about my random and youtube posts.
I’ll try and keep the dev blogs not so wordy and long.
It will be technical but not in great detail.
I guess this blog is mostly for other game developers, programmers and gamers interested in how the console game ’sausage’ is made?
Regardless, it reminds me of the few times I updated my Net Yaroze members site, so so many years ago!
I’m using Silo 3D which is easy to pick up and I’m exporting to the OBJ format, which is also very easy to parse.
I originally made the parser to read only quads which then applies an optional textures and an RGB value (both via the material name) EG: 1:255:100:25 (texture 1, R:G:B).
All poly’s in this file must be quads, the reason why is that textures all 64×64 squares samples.
The high level detail layer, is just a polygon soup, with a special material applied to quads which states it’s texture number and RGB value.
The layer is 100×100, the importer automatically splits all the polygons in the layer into 10 x 10 (100) sections, then it’s put into a Chunk list array of pointers, which is of a grid of 5 × 5 (25) each with a list of 4 Object pointers, I did this last month.
Here it is in Silo 3D, it’s not much to look at, but it’s my test level map:
It increased performance but the major problem was that it still had to process a large number of triangles that were very far away.
This wasn’t a problem for the GPU, but it really slowed down the CPU when it had to remove non visible (back facing) polygons.
The solution was a lower, Level Of Detail (LOD) layer.
This layer is processed the same as the high LOD layer, I actually used a quick goto statement to loop back to redo the low LOD layer!
This is a perfect scenario for using the goto statement, some would say that it should be it’s own function, but no, to me it’s more logical in the loading function.
In game, when doing a visibility test, the function returns the Z value (in camera coordinates), which if it’s greater then X, it uses the low level layer data instead.
//free dynamically allocated arrays for parsing OBJ file
// after loading high detail layer, switch to low detail and process it the same way
if( obj_ptr == &Obj_scene)
obj_cur_root = &g_objLowLevelGridData;
obj_ptr = &Obj_LevelLow;
goto LOOP; // goto start
This is also a polygon soup, obviously with less detail.
Further away chunks being rendered improved performance a lot, so much so I could extend the draw distance considerably!
It’s in yellow to see the LOD swapping, left image LOD, right image more high detail is seen.
Lastly is the height layer, this is just a static grid of 100 x 100, the X & Z coordinates never change only the Y (height) varies as it contours the high LOD layer.
Also each quad is applied a material which has ground information in the name, EG dirt, road, grass, etc.
I know this is very memory inefficient (10,000 array of 1 float and 1 int), but is very CPU efficient, which is more important, it’s just a quick look up table array.
I can also average each array position to the quad’s middle, EG:
g_heightMap[curr_X][curr_Z].y = Obj_hightmap.faces[(curr_X*100) + curr_Z].quad
+ Obj_hightmap.faces[(curr_X*100) + curr_Z+1].quad
+ Obj_hightmap.faces[(curr_X*100) +100 + curr_Z].quad
+ Obj_hightmap.faces[(curr_X*100) +100 + curr_Z+1].quad;
This can also be used for level collision detection.
I’m not sure if this is the best way to do a level 3D model, it is a very labor intensive process, manually editing 3 different layers.
I tried to automatically reduce polygons in fragmotion, blender and MeshLab, but none of them would keep my quads as quads!
Add a car with wheels, so it drives!
Well, that’s it for another month.
Thanks for reading!
PS: Any questions, comments, feedback or corrections, feel free to leave a comment below.